Free Shipping on orders over US$39.99

FTC Discusses Possible Telemarketing Sales Rule Adjustments – The National Law Review

On April 27, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) unanimously approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (and an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)) to make adjustments to the agency’s Telemarketing Sales Rule at 16 C.F.R. Part 310 (TSR). Among other things, the TSR “requires telemarketers to make specific disclosures of material information; prohibits misrepresentations; sets limits on the times telemarketers may call consumers; prohibits calls to a consumer who has asked not to be called again; and sets payment restrictions for the sale of certain goods and services.” 
The NPRM would, among other things, “require telemarketers and sellers to maintain additional records of their telemarketing transactions, prohibit material misrepresentations and false or misleading statements in business to business (“B2B”) telemarketing transactions, and add a new definition for the term “previous donor.”
With respect to the changes to the existing B2B exemption, the NPRM notes that “[s]ince 2003, the Commission has continued to see businesses harmed by deceptive B2B telemarketing,” citing a number of different forms “including schemes that sell business directory listings, web hosting or design services, search engine optimization services, and market-specific advertising opportunities, as well as schemes that impersonate the government.” As a result, the agency “believes it is now time to reassess the B2B exemption and address problems associated with B2B telemarketing.”
For now, the agency proposes “to require all B2B telemarketing calls to comply with the TSR’s existing prohibitions on misrepresentations articulated in Sections 310.3(a)(2) and 310.3(a)(4).” These provisions deal with “(1) several types of material misrepresentations in 3 the sale of goods or services; and (2) false or misleading statements to induce a person to pay for goods or services or to induce a charitable contribution.”
However, as part of the separate ANPRM, the FTC “seeks comments on the B2B exemption generally, including comments addressing whether the Commission should remove the exemption entirely.” The ANPRM would also consider other changes.
Both the NPRM and ANPRM pose specific questions on which the agency seeks input. The latter includes a specific list of “Questions for Business-to-Business Telemarketing Calls.”
Comments on the NPRM and ANRPM will be due no later than 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
About this Author
Paul Besozzi concentrates his practice in the wireless, broadband and emerging technology areas. His extensive experience of more than 30 years in the telecommunications field includes regulatory, transactional, legislative and litigation matters for clients ranging from wireless service and infrastructure providers to resellers of long-distance service, including cellular, personal communications services, specialized mobile radio, point-to-point microwave, advanced wireless services and other emerging wireless technologies.
Paul represents clients before the federal and state…
As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.


rafi rajib
We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Reset Password
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart